Greetings,

 

February 23, 2009

 

Frequently Asked Questions about the Tentative Agreement on a Contract Extension

 

 

Here are answers to some of the questions asked at the initial road shows and that we have received directly from members.

 

 

Q.            If we do not ratify this contract extension, where are we?

 

A.            If the extension TA does not ratify:

 

 We will remain in the VPP, which did not have a 2008 pay out.

 

We will begin the Section Six negotiations process.  We will post for applicants, interview, select and train a Negotiating Committee, conduct a Negotiations Survey, draft an opener and begin negotiations this Spring.

 

The new 17th step increase of 2% from the 2006 contract will take effect May 1, 2009.

 

Those still eligible for step increases will continue to move up the current pay scale.

 

The amount of our monthly insurance costs (18% share of the premium) can increase for 2010, subject to the caps in the updated chart in Section 23.  After 2010, they cannot change/increase again until the completion of Section Six Negotiations.

 

The PBS re-ratification vote will take place Fall of 2010.

 

Q.            What happens if the extension TA ratifies?

 

A.            If the extension TA ratifies:

 

We will receive the 2008 PBP payment in April 2009; it will be equal to 2.5%, or .025% x your 2008 w-2 earnings.

 

The new 17th step increase of 2% will be in effect May 1, 2009.

 

Those still eligible for step increases will continue to move up the current pay scale.

 

The amount of our monthly insurance costs (18% of the premium) can increase for 2010, subject to the caps in the updated chart from Section 23.

 

We will participate in PBP in 2009 and beyond; we will no longer participate in VPP.

 

There will be a 1.5% increase to all rates of pay effective May 1, 2010.

 

The PBS re-ratification vote will take place Fall of 2010.

 

We will begin the negotiations process in late 2010—select and train a Negotiating Committee, distribute a negotiations survey to the group to ascertain our priorities, draft an opener and begin Negotiations May of 2011.

 

The amount of our monthly insurance costs (18% of the premium) can increase for 2011, subject to the caps in the updated chart from Section 23.

 

There will be a 1.5% increase on all rates of pay effective May 1, 2011.

 

The amount of our monthly insurance costs (18% of the premium) can increase for 2012, subject to the caps in the updated chart from Section 23.  They cannot change/increase again until the completion of Section Six Negotiations.

 

Q.            Are there any changes to our contract that are not included in the documents we have been given?

 

A.            No.

 

Q.            Does the MEC’s neutrality on the tentative mean that they don’t think it’s a good idea?

 

A.            No.

 

Q.            What effect does this TA have on our vote on PBS?

 

A.            None.  That vote will still take place in the Fall of 2010 (two years after PBS was implemented).

 

Q.            Doesn’t it help us to have the PBS re-ratification occur while we are in Negotiations?

 

A   When the 2006 contract was ratified, we expected PBS to be fully implemented by March 2007, so the re-ratification vote would have been held in March 2009, before negotiations began.  The idea was that both sides would know the outcome prior to negotiations.  That was important because not knowing which scheduling system we would be using would put negotiations into a stall.  Traditionally, scheduling is one of the most important pieces of the process.  Not knowing which system we would be using until 17 months into negotiations would mean we couldn’t make any scheduling and/or related proposals.  Management would not make any proposals that involved money as they wouldn’t know their costs until after the vote.

 

The idea also presumes we want to have the ratification process influenced by negotiations.  Those that wish to keep PBS do not want to be told they have to vote it down on the hopes of other improvements.  If management offered improvements before the vote took place they would most certainly be contingent upon the ratification of PBS.  Then those that want to go back to pre-built lines will be appropriately angry, charging that they were being blackmailed.

 

Q.            What does “Contract Maximum” mean in the updated insurance chart?

 

A.            As with the original chart in your contract, the chart shows the “worst case scenario” increase in our insurance costs in the additional two years.  Each figure is 15% above the previous year’s cost.   As you see from the actual figures we have updated the original projections with the new “worst case scenario.”  Historically costs have not hit the 15% threshold.  At each year’s open enrollment, we get the figures for next year’s costs.  In any year that we don’t see the maximum 15% increase, the “worst case scenario” for every subsequent year becomes even lower, so all the numbers in the out years decrease.

 

Q.            How does this extension affect my insurance costs?

 

A.            The current contract permitted insurance rates to increase by up to 15% in each year of the contract.  To date the actual annual increases have been under that 15%.  Under both the extension and the contract, insurance costs can be increased by up to 15% over 2009 rates for 2010.  Under the current contract, the 2010 rates would then freeze until a new contract was negotiated.  Under the extension, rates could increase up to the 15% in 2011 and 2012, and then they would freeze while until a new contract was negotiated.  In both scenarios, the value of the freeze depends on how long it takes us to negotiate a new agreement and what changes, if any, we were able to obtain in that agreement.

 

Because we have never hit the maximum increases you see in your contract, adding two years of “worst case scenario” to the current chart means that the maximum potential costs that could be in effect at the end of 2012 would be only about $2-$5 (depending on coverage) greater than they were projected to have been for 2010.

 

Q.            Do we still have a me-too with the pilots on insurance?

 

A.            We have a me-too on the plan, but not on our monthly costs.  If the pilots improve (or worsen) the plan, we will get the improvements.  If they increase their share of the insurance premium (say from 18% to 20%), we would still pay 18%, and we would still have the 15% cap on annual increases.  This is true regardless of whether we extend the contract or not.

 

 

Q.            We were shown PBP calculations based on earnings of $20,000, $40,000 and $60,000.  What if I made $44,000 last year—do I only get the amount based on $40,000.

 

A.            No.  The examples were meant to be just that, examples. PBP for 2008 will be paid at the rate of 2.5% of your W-2 wages.  To determine your payment, multiply your 2008 W-2 wages by .025.  For an historical calculation you can use .011 to see what your 2007 payout would have been and .075 to see what your 2006 payout would have been.  The payout for 2008 will occur on April 20, if the extension ratifies.

 

Q.            Can the PBP formula be changed?

 

A.            Yes, the Board of Directors can change the plan.  However, PBP is a component of the compensation of all management employees, so they have an incentive to structure it to ensure a payout. 

 

Q.            Does the change to PBP, or anything in the extension, have an effect on our 401(k)

 

A.            No.

 

Q.            Does the change from VPP to PBP affect my OPR payments?

 

A.            No.

 

Q.            Why does management want this?

 

A.            The pay increase we arrived at is in line with those we typically see in negotiations.  Negotiations do cost money, and spread management resources thin.  They do not foster stable labor relations, and that can impact our stock value.  Company leaders have expressed that they would like to focus on running the airline right now, and they saw the extension as potentially beneficial to both the Flight Attendants and management.  That said, they are prepared to enter into Section Six negotiations if the extension does not ratify.

 

Q.            If I vote yes, don’t I lose my chance to be survey on my negotiations goals?

 

A.            No.  We would conduct the survey prior to beginning negotiations in 2011.

 

 

Thank you for your questions and attendance at the base meetings.

 

Kelle Wells, MEC President and your MEC/LEC Officers.

 

 

And a reminder:

 

Alaska/AFA Proposed Contract Extension Conference Calls:

 

Dial 1-800-260-0702  --  enter the Participant Access Code for the

appropriate date.  There is a different access code for each date.

 

Calls are Pacific Time

 

 

Friday, February 27th       1:00 PM - 3:00 PM   Access Code 987991

Wednesday, March 4Th   8:00 AM - 10:00 AM  Access Code 987992

 

 

Please call in to ask your questions about the contract extension or just

listen to questions and answers.