Greetings,

October Merged Contract Negotiations Update
 

Your MEC Officers, President Lisa LeCarre and Secretary-Treasurer Jeff Albers continue their focus on negotiations toward contract improvements in a merged contract. Along with the rest of the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) merged contract negotiations continued last month with meetings in Phoenix on September 8-11, and in Charlotte on September 28 through October 1, 2009.  Last month, merged contract negotiations focused on three contract sections.         

 

Scheduling  - HP Sections 6, 7&16/US Section 9

 

The Scheduling section continues to be negotiated.  The Company gave AFA a scheduling proposal that contains substantially revised rescheduling language.  Rescheduling is a very important topic and governs how a flight attendant is treated and paid during irregular operations.   

 

AFA’s basic position is that a Lineholder should not be treated like a Reserve. Some major differences we have had with the Company in this area concern the Company’s ability to remove a Flight Attendant from her/his pairing and when the Company has to get the Flight Attendant back to domicile when they are rescheduled. At our next negotiations session in PHX, AFA will formulate a counterproposal to the rescheduling section. 

 

We also had discussion of Reserve issues, as the Company is preparing a counterproposal on Reserve.  AFA reiterated the need for contract language that allows scheduling flexibility, trip choices and processes for earned income through Company open time and personal trades for Reserves. Again AFA voiced opposition to tagging, and the “buckets” for order of assignment.

           

International Flying – HP Section 34/US Section 12

 

An International section counter-proposal was passed from the Company to AFA.  Improvements in this section include the designation of Mexico as a non-transoceanic international (NTI) destination. Hawaii would be designated as transoceanic international (TI) flying and any flying to South American cities south of the Panama-Columbian border would also be considered TI flying with the additional premiums applied.

 

AFA has not agreed to the separation of International flying into an exclusive division in which flight attendants would bid in seniority and would perform all international flying.  AFA believes that an International Division would restrict a Flight Attendant’s bidding options especially in consideration of a PBS system.  There are additional concerns about restrictions placed on bidding for vacations within a division as well as restricting the ability of all flight attendants the ability to work international trips.

 

Instead, this week the Company proposed an international purser program called the Cabin Service Director or CSD program. The CSD program would be a Lead A position on Transoceanic International flights.  The CSD position would require additional training and have  enhanced duties and responsibilities on CSD designated flights. The CSD positions would be awarded based upon seniority in each domicile, and would require a 6-month commitment.

 

AFA has agreed to consider the Company proposed Cabin Service Director language as long as the Company agrees to premium pay associated with these positions.

 

General – HP Section 27/US Section 30

 

Finally, AFA passed the General Section counterproposal to the Company this week. A major issue revolves around the tidying of aircraft.  Although we are still apart on some specifics, the East contact contains greater restrictions on aircraft tidying than the West contract so West flight attendants will see improved cleaning language.

 

The Joint Negotiating Committee will meet again October 13-15 in Phoenix and October 27-29 in Charlotte.