|
ATU Action Weekly Update -
1/29/07
ATU
Urges Congress to "Unfreeze" Transit Funding
As reported in last week's
ATU Action Weekly Update, Congressional leaders are currently
planning to freeze governmental spending at current levels for
the remainder of the Fiscal Year. If this happens,
investment in the federal transit program would fall $470
million short of levels authorized and guaranteed under
SAFETEA-LU, the five-year transit bill passed in
2005.
Democratic leaders were left
with few options when the past Republican-controlled Congress
failed to pass 11 of the 13 governmental spending bills needed
to keep the government running for the year. According to
the new leadership, a freeze is necessary for the Democrats
to start fresh on their ambitious legislative agenda and begin
consideration of FY 2008 appropriations bills.
In a letter being sent to
all Senators and Representatives this week, the ATU urges
members to increase funding for public transit - stressing
the role that transit plays in reducing our dependence on
foreigh oil.
"Current public
transportation usage reduces U.S. gasoline consumption by 1.4
billion gallons each year. That is the equivalent of 108
million fewer cars filling up every year - almost 300,000 every
day, 34 fewer supertankers leaving the Middle East, or 90% of
oil imported from Kuwait," reads the letter signed by ATU
International President Warren George. "If we are serious
about energy independence in this country, public transit must
be part of the solution."
Please contact
your representatives in the U.S. Senate and House of
Representatives immediately and urge them to support
full funding of the transit program in the forthcoming full-year
FY 2007 continuing resolution at the levels authorized and
guaranteed under SAFETEA-LU. Ask them to fund the federal
transit program at the $8.975 billion level. Make sure to
explain how a freeze in funding would impact your transit system
and your community.
Bush's
State of the Union Ignores Reality
President George W. Bush delivered a State of the Union
address last week that painted a very different picture
of our country than that experienced by the average
American.
Bush declared the economy is "on the move" and growing.
Senator Jim Webb (D-VA), who gave the Democratic response
following the State of the Union, presented another, more
realistic view. "When one looks at the health of our
economy, it's almost as if we are living in two different
countries," Webb said. "Some say that things have never
been better. The stock market is at an all-time high, and
so are corporate profits. But these benefits are not being
fairly shared. Wages and salaries for our workers are at
all-time lows as a percentage of national wealth, even though
the productivity of American workers is the highest in the
world. Medical costs have skyrocketed. College
tuition rates are off the charts. Our manufacturing base
is being dismantled and sent overseas. Good American jobs
are being sent along with them," Webb countered.
Despite Bush's optimistic view of our country's economy, the
real facts are that 37 million Americans live in poverty, 3
million good manufacturing jobs have disappeared since he took
office, and 47 million Americans have no health insurance.
While Bush acknowledged that millions of Americans have no
health insurance, he failed to present a plan that would address
this crisis. In fact, health care policy experts argue
that the Bush proposal would actually increase the number of
uninsured and underinsured by providing an incentive for
employers to drop their employer-sponsored coverage.
On other issues, including retirement security, Medicare, and
education, Bush offered little in the way of solutions, only
urging Congress to work together on these issues. He
failed to even mention many of the issues of most importance to
America's workers, including raising the minimum wage, lowering
prescription drug costs, passing the Employer Free Choice Act,
or addressing the soaring cost of higher education.
Senate
Fails to Pass a Clean Minimum Wage Bill
Despite the best efforts of those in the new Democratic
majority, the Senate was unable to pass a clean minimum wage
bill last week. A majority of Senators - 54 - voted to
raise the minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 without
handing out more business tax breaks. But the mostly
Republican opponents of a clean minimum wage increase
filibustered the measure, and it takes 60 votes to end debate on
a filibustered bill.
Now the Senate will take up a minimum wage bill that includes
tax breaks and other giveaways President Bush wants - and it's
expected to pass!
Even more suprising is that 28 Senators voted last Wednesday
to repeal the minimum wage! The repeal
was included in an amendment offered by Republican Senator Wayne
Allard (R-CO). Below is a list of Senators who voted yes
on this amendment - if any of them represent you, let them
know that they were wrong:
Alexander (R-TN); Allard (R-CO); Bennett (R-UT); Bond (R-MO);
Brownback (R-KS); Bunning (R-KY); Burr (R-NC); Chambliss (R-GA);
Coburn (R-OK); Cochran (R-MS); Cornyn (R-TX); Craig (R-ID);
Crapo (R-ID); DeMint (R-SC); Ensign (R-NV); Enzi (R-WY); Graham
(R-SC); Gregg (R-NH); Hagel (R-NE); Hatch (R-UT); Inhofe (R-OK);
Isakson (R-GA); Kyl (R-AZ); Lott (R-MS); McCain (R-AZ);
McConnell (R-KY); Sununu (R-NH) and Thomas
(R-WY).
The final vote on the minimum wage increase will
likely be this week. Act now, and send a message to your
U.S. representative and Senators and ask them to pass a clean
minimum wage increase with no more business handouts. Click
here to send your message.
|