|
ATU Action Weekly Update -
2/26/07
House to Act on Employee Free Choice
Act This Week
The U.S. House will begin consideration this Thursday on the
Employee Free Choice Act. Floor consideration of the
measure follows a week of events in members' home districts
last week and numerous briefings and press conferences to
promote the bill early this week.
If passed, the Employee Free Choice Act would make the
process of choosing a union more fair by:
- Establishing stronger penalties for violation of employee
rights when workers seek to form a union and during
first-contract negotiations.
- Providing mediation and arbitration for first-contract
disputes.
- Allowing employees to form unions by signing cards
authorizing union representation.
Currently, if employees present an employer with union
authorization cards signed by a majority, the employer can
demand a secret ballot election supervised by the National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB). But the NLRB election process is broken
because it enables employers to intimidate, coerce and harass
workers and drag out the process indefinitely.
If your Member of Congress is already a
co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act, click here to send them a thank you
email and to ask them to take a leadership role in passing this
legislation.
If your Member of Congress is not a
co-sponsor, click here to urge them to support this
important legislation.
ATU Locals
Participate in Week of Action Events on EFCA
Across the country last week, ATU members joined thousands of
other union members in participating in events with Members of
Congress to highlight the need for the Employee Free Choice
Act.
In Palm Beach, Florida, ATU Local 1577 President/Business
Agent Dwight Mattingly stood by Hazel Pagan, an employee of MV
Transportation, as she spoke about the working conditions
at MV and the difficulty in forming a union for the
employees. Employees are being forced to work overtime and
on days off, with no paid vacation days, holidays or even sick
days. Employees who complain about these conditions, or
who refuse to work on their day off, are disciplined or
fired. According to Sister Pagan, the Employee Free Choice
Act would make it easier for employees to form a union and fight
for better working conditions.
Sister Pagan's story is similar to the stories told by
hundreds of other hard working Americans who stood up last week
to urge their Member of Congress to pass the Employee Free
Choice Act. For more coverage of these events, go
to: www.employeefreechoiceact.org.
ATU
Urges Senate to Protect TSA Screeners' Bargaining
Rights
As the Senate prepares to consider the 9-11 Commission
Recommendations bill (S. 4) next week, the ATU is joining
with several other unions, including the American
Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), in sending a letter
to each Senator asking the them to oppose any amendments to the
measure that would strike or weaken language which provides
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screeners with
collective bargaining and other civil service protections.
Last week, the
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted in
favor of an amendment by Senator Joseph Lieberman granting
collective bargaining and other labor rights to 45,000
Transportation Security Officers (TSOs). This amendment is
identical to the one included in the House version of the
bill.
TSOs
currently are allowed to join unions, but in 2003, TSA Under
Secretary Loy issued a directive that prohibits TSOs from
engaging in collective bargaining. The Lieberman amendment
grants TSOs the right to bargain collectively as well as the
same civil service protections as other workers at TSA and the
Department of Homeland Security.
"Without enforcement of
labor protection laws that ensure fair treatment, safe
workplaces, and protection for whistleblowers against
retaliation from supervisors, national security is jeopardized,"
states the letter.
"The public will
never receive the highly-trained, career screener workforce it
demanded after the tragic events of September 11th if TSOs are
not granted these fundamental labor
rights."
|