Archive for the 'Workers' rights' Category

Our Lacking Labor Laws

November 25th, 2008

American Rights at Work just released two new fact sheets to showcase more failures of our current labor law system in protecting workers. The first, “The Inadequate Costs of Labor Law Violations,” exposes the inadequate penalties employers face for violating the National Labor Relations Act — particularly in comparison with the penalties that employers face for breaking other types of employment law.

The second, “The Haves and the Have Nots: How American Labor Law Denies a Quarter of the Workforce Collective Bargaining Rights,” exposes how outdated labor law system denies millions of Americans the opportunity to join unions and thus bargain collectively with their employers. Appallingly, 33.5 million, or 23.8% of the civilian workforce, have no collective bargaining rights under the NLRA or other labor law.

Making Employee Free Choice a Reality

November 18th, 2008

American Rights at Work has launched a new television ad promoting the Employee Free Choice Act just in time to greet members of Congress returning to D.C. after a hard-fought campaign season.

Voters made it clear they want action taken to strengthen the middle class, and the Employee Free Choice Act is a critical part of the economic recovery we need. By restoring the freedom to form unions, this bill will help America’s workers get better health care, job security, and benefits.

Over 60 percent of the public as well as a majority of the incoming Congress support the measure, and it was cosponsored by both President-elect Obama and Vice President-elect Biden. Talking Points Memo reports that the ad, part of a broad effort to gain support for the Employee Free Choice Act and get it passed, started airing on Sunday and will run nationally on CNN, MSNBC and CNN Headline for three weeks.

Visit FreeChoiceAct.org/AFSCME for more information on the Employee Free Choice Act and to join the fight to pass this important piece of legislation.

New FMLA Rules Hurt Families

November 17th, 2008

The Bush Administration has just issued new rules for the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) which are designed to make it harder for workers to use leave when they need to take care of themselves or family members.

AFL-CIO President John Sweeney issued the following statement on these new regulations:

Today’s eleventh-hour move by the Bush Administration to weaken the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is another slap in the face to working families who are struggling just to get by in the midst of an unprecedented economic crisis. It’s reprehensible – but all too predictable – that the Bush Administration would use its final days in office to give business interests one more gift by placing more hurdles in front of workers who need to care for their families.

Since the FMLA’s inception in 1993, workers have taken the leave they needed more than 100 million times, making it one of the most successful pro-worker laws in history. While the regulations implementing the new FMLA provisions on military family leave are largely viewed as a positive step, the Administration could have been more generous, and there is still work to be done to make sure that military families get the help they need. The other revisions would generally restrict workers’ ability to access paid leave without putting their jobs at risk.

Given the worsening economic situation facing families, we should be talking about how to expand successful laws like the FMLA to provide workers more job security and flexibility to deal with urgent family situations, not less.

Read more at the AFL-CIO Now blog.

The March Goes On!

November 7th, 2008

When President-elect Barack Obama came to the AFSCME Convention in 2006, he spoke about the 1968 Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike. It’s a story, he said, of ordinary people making “the extraordinary decision that if we stand together, we rise together” and “achieve extraordinary things.”

What those workers in Memphis fought for, Obama pointed out, is the idea that we have a collective responsibility to each other, “to fight for wages that can raise a family, health care if we get sick, a retirement that’s dignified, working conditions that are safe.”

That AFSCME strike was a milestone in the history of our country, when the labor and civil rights movements came together to demand basic rights and respect for all working men and women.

Last Tuesday’s election was another milestone in building an America that lives up to its ideals. People rose up, volunteered enthusiastically to campaign for change, unify our nation and make history. Just like the AFSCME sanitation workers who walked off the job to bring about change, millions of Americans voted Nov. 4 to move our nation forward with an agenda that values workers and their families.

The strike in Memphis may have ended nearly forty years ago, but the march goes on today. There are many battles yet to be won.

Michael Honey, author of a book on the Memphis Strike, notes that “Obama’s campaign proved that ordinary people do extraordinary things when working together. His dramatic and joyful election victory affirmed the power of organizing.”

He adds:

“Now it’s time for phase two: for churches, unions, community groups and other organizations to demand action from government. President Obama will need us to support him and to push to fulfill our hopes and promises. We need to take the next steps to make real the promise of a revitalized democracy. That won’t happen without mass citizen involvement. As King would tell us, we still need to organize.”

Dean: Workers Deserve a Fair Shake

November 7th, 2008

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean appeared on Hardball Wednesday to discuss the priorities for President-elect Barack Obama’s administration. The first example host Chris Matthews brought up was the Employee Free Choice Act.

What Matthews refers to as “card check” is a key piece of legislation that will make it easier for workers to form unions. Gov. Dean argued that, after eight years of abuses, it’s time to level the playing field for working families.

“It is our job to make sure that working-class and middle class people get their fair share and a fair shake, which they haven’t done in the last eight years.

“That’s what the campaign was all-all about. That was probably the single biggest issue that-that elected Barack Obama and Joe Biden, is, let’s do something for middle-class Americans and working-class Americans, who haven’t had much done for them in the last eight years.”

Join the fight for the Employee Free Choice Act by signing our online petition.

(hat tip to thsisnotanexit at Daily Kos)

McCain Blasts Free Choice Act

October 29th, 2008

The Employee Free Choice Act will help restore workers’ freedom to form unions and bargain for a better life. And John McCain says he would veto it “in a New York minute.”

In a CNBC interview on Tuesday, McCain said it would be “very, very, very unfortunate” if this legislation were passed.

“The way that Senator Obama envisions — and the unions, and this is their big push, they’ve gotten commitments from Senator Obama and Senator Biden — union organizer goes to your house and says, Hey, Joe, can I sign you up for the union?

“That is — we all know what that opens the door to. It’s dangerous for America, it’s dangerous to small business. And I think it’s a threat to one of the fundamentals of democracy.”

Yes, Senator McCain, we all know what would happen next: better wages, benefits and working conditions. Quality, affordable health care for all. Retirement security. Improved public education and affordable higher education. The list goes on.

Barack Obama is a co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act and will work with the Congress to pass this important legislation. Take this opportunity to sign AFSCME’s petition, and be sure to vote for the candidate who will support working families.

Read more on the AFL-CIO Now blog and at Think Progress.

Paid for by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees PEOPLE (1625 L St, NW, Washington, DC 20036) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Questioning Sarah Palin

October 1st, 2008

This entry by AFSCME President Gerald McEntee was originally posted on The Huffington Post.

Traditionally, in America, political candidates don’t hide from the press. Yet, until last week, that’s exactly what the Republican candidate for Vice President had been doing. Unlike Joe Biden, who has met with the press more than 40 times since joining the Democratic ticket, Sarah Palin had never held a press conference or sat down for a one-on-one interview. She has now emerged from the political cone-of-silence that the lobbyists who run the McCain campaign placed her in. Not surprisingly, her conversations with Charlie Gibson, Sean Hannity and Katie Couric have generated enormous interest and comment.

Some on the right, however, wish she had been kept under wraps. Conservative columnists and pundits are competing to see who can say the pithiest disparaging thing about the fast-fading star from Alaska. They have been stunned not only by what she’s said in the interviews, but also by the overarching sense that she is not a deep thinker on issues of policy, she lacks curiosity and she turns each question she can’t answer into an opportunity to portray herself as a victim of East Coast elitists who reject the candidacy of someone who represents “Joe Six-pack.”

At the same time, the brilliant writer/actress/comedian Tina Fey has dominated the cable news programs and entertainment television programs with her masterful impersonation of Palin, most recently satirizing the candidate’s nearly incoherent interview with Katie Couric. What makes the Tina Fey skits so funny — beside the wonderful contribution made by her fellow Saturday Night Live castmate Amy Poehler — is that Fey nails her impersonation with a splendid but subtle comedic touch, and she salts her satire with verbatim Palin quotes.

Like many, I’m appalled that so much of what Palin says makes no sense. However, by focusing on the comedy, we may be missing a deeper truth about Palin. She is a remarkably successful politician, and she clearly knows how to communicate. She’s a skilled and smart debater who’s won every debate she’s had to participate in, including successful televised debates with prior Alaska governors who she went on to defeat. When prepared, she is able to hone her language to take advantage of opportunities to define herself as a candidate who represents working people, who opposes the status quo.

This was on perfect display earlier this week when Palin spoke by phone with conservative talk-radio host Hugh Hewitt. When asked about working people struggling during hard times, Palin’s response was as powerful as anything I’ve heard recently from any politician:

“There’s been a lot of times that Todd and I have had to figure out how we were going to pay for health insurance. We’ve gone through periods of our life here with paying out of pocket for health coverage until Todd and I both landed a couple of good union jobs. Early on in our marriage, we didn’t have health insurance, and we had to either make the choice of paying out of pocket for catastrophic coverage or just crossing our fingers, hoping that nobody would get hurt, nobody would get sick. So I know what Americans are going through there.”

She pulls a powerful emotional chord and aligns herself with the working families who are struggling today to deal with rising health care costs. She makes you think that she supports efforts to restrain those costs. She makes you think that she’ll fight for you. She even makes you think that she’s a supporter of unions.

But none of these things are true. If the policies promoted in the Republican Party platform are ever enacted into law, every couple will have to white knuckle their way through their early years with no health insurance and lots of tough choices. Plus there won’t be many union jobs for them to land.

Palin’s powerful presentation raises real questions: Does she know that John McCain’s plan for health care is the opposite for health care for all? Does she support taxing employer-provided health benefits that come with millions of union jobs? Does she want to leave people to fend for themselves in a hostile, private health insurance market, purchasing health care for their families without the expertise and bargaining power that comes with employer-sponsored health care benefits?

Sarah Palin is plenty articulate when talking about the struggles she and her family have faced, and when she was talking to Hugh Hewitt she summed up perfectly the experience that so many young couples face with health care. I’d like to hear what she’s going to DO about it: What exactly will Palin do to help families get the health insurance they need? What will she and John McCain do to help ensure that there are union jobs that provide the kind of health care security the Palins received when they “landed a couple of good union jobs”?

Labor Day 2008: Support Employee Free Choice

September 4th, 2008

This guest post was written by Michael Honey, Haley Professor of the Humanities at the University of Washington, Tacoma, and a former holder of the Harry Bridges labor studies chair at the University of Washington. His recent book, “Going Down Jericho Road: The Memphis Strike, Martin Luther King’s Last Campaign,” recently won the Robert F. Kennedy Book Award. He is President of the national Labor and Working-Class History Association.

Labor Day 2008 marks a moment of crisis for middle and working-class Americans. Housing, health care, transportation, education and job needs are growing acute in an economy that has been run into a ditch. If you have been paying any attention at all for the last eight years, you know what I’m talking about. Yet 2008 also may be a time of significant change. People are fed up and many are demanding a new direction.

However, really changing the American economy is a long-term project and it revolves around improving the conditions of American workers. Furthermore, whether things get better and incomes go up in the months to come depends a great deal on whether workers are able to organize unions. In a recent opinion survey by Peter D. Hart Associates, 65 percent supported unions while only 25 percent did not. That is no surprise: by one research estimate, unionized workers earn 30% higher wages, are 59% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, and are 400% more likely to have pensions than their non-union counterparts. Unionized workers have more rights than those without unions, and a union still remains the best anti-poverty program for a wage earner, as Martin Luther King once said.

In Washington State, New York and a few other places, nearly 20 percent of workers belong to unions. But nationally, less than 12 percent do and in the South and parts of the west the percentages are much lower. If statistics show that workers want unions and that unions improve their conditions, why do so many not have them?

In many work places, employees simply do not have the freedom to choose. Employers blatantly disregard their First Amendment rights to speak, associate, and organize. The National Labor Relations Board, stacked against unions by the Bush administration, admits that at least a fifth of those who try to join a union get fired instead. The actual percentage is much higher. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch designate the land of the brave and the home of the free as one of the greatest violators of workers rights. American workers are not free.

This summer, federal agents in Smithfield, North Carolina, slowed a campaign to organize a union of African-American, Anglo and Latino packinghouse workers with deportation raids. Across the land, deportations turned into felony proceedings, imprisoning workers and smashing union organizing in the process.

Many of us have seen the full-page ads employer groups place in newspapers falsely blaming unions for America’s huge job losses (half a million in the last six months). They even mail anti-union literature into the homes of workers when they try to organize, while employers curse and run union representatives off job sites. Employers systematically break federal labor laws to put unions out of business.

This summer, Wal-Mart held captive audience meetings warning its employees against voting for Democrats. They said Democrats will support the Employee Free Choice Act (which they will), and claimed EFCA will force them to join a union (which it will not). This is blatantly illegal and underlines the simple fact that we need to strengthen labor laws and their enforcement to stop corporate bullying of employees.

Last year, EFCA passed in the House of Representatives but Republicans prevented a vote in the Senate. It allows workers to form unions through majority sign-up rather than through elections procedures that take years and have become a travesty as employers hold captive audience meetings to pressure workers into voting against unions. EFCA shields workers from such practices. It increases penalties for illegal employer actions, and creates mechanisms for binding arbitration for first collective bargaining contracts when employers refuse to bargain in good faith or the parties can’t reach an agreement.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has made defeat of EFCA in the next Congress a top legislative priority. In contrast, union supporters are signing millions of post cards and circulating a national petition to support EFCA in the next Congress. Senator Barack Obama co-sponsored EFCA while Senator John McCain voted against it, so as they battle it out for President, employee freedom of choice hangs in the balance.

Employee free choice and union growth offer the most direct path to reduce the monstrous economic disparities between the great majority of wage and salary earners and the top 1 percent of the population, which owns more wealth than 90 percent of Americans combined. Unions are also important if we are to rejuvenate progressive politics in America. As Stewart Acuff and Sheldon Friedman recently wrote in the Huffington Post, “Social security, civil rights, women’s rights, progressive taxation, high-quality public education and health care for all are but a small sample of the national policies that cannot be defended or implemented without a strong labor movement.”

This Labor Day 2008 is a critical time that holds the possibility for sweeping political and economic change. Vote like the future of working-class and middle-class America depends upon it, because it does.

AFSCME in San Francisco – Homage to Memphis

August 1st, 2008

Day 4 of AFSCME’s 38th International Convention: This day was about activism, so, fittingly, we also honored the 40th anniversary of AFSCME Memphis sanitation workers’ strike and the tragic assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Ruth Davis, proud President of Local 1733, introduced a special video saying, “The video honors Local 1733’s fight, determination and their victory that underlies not only Local 1733, but all of AFSCME and the House of Labor.”

See the video below:

AFSCME in San Francisco – We Make Organizing Happen

July 31st, 2008

Day 3 of AFSCME’s 38th International Convention: Organizing was in the spotlight yesterday as delegates heard inspiring stories of successful campaigns and contract fights, bruising battles against anti-union bosses and exciting accounts by volunteer member organizers (VMOs) who are helping workers win a voice on the job.

Led by Brian Blackledge, a corrections officer and member of Ohio Civil Service Employees Association (OCSEA)/Local 11, the special program featured testimonials from eight members who described how joining the union changes lives. Child care providers from Wisconsin and Michigan, a registered nurse from California and a utilities worker from Oklahoma all talked about doing what many said was impossible.

AFSCME members who work for school bus operator First Student Inc. spoke about the threats they faced while trying to organize and the thrill of victory when they won. The international company – the largest school bus contractor worldwide – is notorious for threatening and intimidating workers and union organizers.

As a VMO, Blackledge helped workers fight for bargaining rights in Kentucky. He urged delegates to get involved and become VMOs themselves.

Watch these inspiring members below: