Many concerns have been raised by faculty and staff. Below are some important questions that have been raised.
· Why is the time limit so short? The survey was mailed on July 6 with a September 4 deadline. Especially for employees on vacation and faculty who are on 9-month appointments who may be away from home during the summer doing research or pursuing their own continuing education, this could be disastrous.
· Is there an appeal process? If so, what is it?
· How will employees’ personal information be protected?
· The online verification system is confusing, requiring an identification number that is printed only on the paper verification form, not on the instructions or the letter, and asking for different documents than those referenced in the general description of acceptable verification.
· The online system advises users – after all the documentation has been submitted – that they will be contacted only if additional information is needed. There is no confirmation that the submission has been received, much less accepted.
· Is the state insurance fund really being defrauded by state employees? If so, by how much?
· Why was a private contractor hired? How much is the state paying for this project? Could it not have been handled by existing personnel?
· How much will it cost the state to reinstate dependents who were mistakenly dropped?
· How much will it cost the state to handle claims for uninsured dependents that should have been covered?
· Why has there been so little communication? Employees received a one-page notice from the state advising them that the survey was coming, followed a few weeks later by a mailing from Secova containing the survey. Employees have reported that it looked like advertising, not like an official document.
· Why is Secova’s e-mail address for assistance not responsive? Employees have reported waiting a week or more for a response, if one comes at all.
Given that withdrawal of coverage is the default, there is no question that some spouses or children of state employees will be without coverage for some period of time, and that getting them covered again will be expensive and uncertain.. The most serious problem will be when somebody's sick child or spouse is denied coverage because of this short-sighted state policy.