July 28, 2006 - Please post & share

Together We'll Tear It Down!
  We need to break through the wall that Verizon is building around Verizon Business -- a wall that limits union wages, benefits, and work to the core.

The wall that Verizon is building around VZ Business is a BAD idea. Bad for workers, bad for customers, bad for shareholders, and bad for business.

Verizon is using VZ Business -- and its non-union working conditions -- to perform communications work usually done at union rates and benefits.

Clerical, tech, service, and operator work is being moved out of the bargaining unit -- even for non-Enterprise customers.

  • If small and medium business customers purchase MCI platform products, such as VoIP, their DA and operator calls will be handled at former MCI call centers.
  • Orders for POTS circuits coming to union service reps for one huge customer have dropped by 90% since the merger.
  • In Washington state, tech work for Washington Mutual bank will be performed by VZB employees.

Verizon's BAD plan sets the stage for labor unrest -- the last thing Wall Street wants to hear when it's already jittery about Verizon's FiOS vs. cable.

It's up to us to get Verizon to change this BAD plan.

Educate your co-workers, report info to your Local, and mobilize!

It'll Take All of Us!

Remember:
Please report any examples of VZ Enterprise or Wholesale work that has been shifted to VZ Business, or work that would have come to the bargaining unit in the past but is now going directly to Verizon Business.

Also, please identify any business process, location, CO, or customer premise where our work is co-located with VZ Business, including plant.

Send the information to unityatverizon@cwa-union.org

In This Issue

Together We'll Tear It Down!
Locals Spread the Word About Verizon Business
IBEW & CWA Fight Telecom Redlining
Retirees Fight for Pension Increase
CWA Technician Brent Cheney Killed on the Job
"One Day Longer": Cable Workers Hang Tough
COLA Increase to Be Paid Under VZ-East Contracts

Verizon Business employees: Don't stand for inferior treatment!

Join with us and protect wages, benefits, job security, and working conditions for all Verizon workers.

To learn more, visit us on the web at www.cwa-union.org/verizon or contact CWA at
800-424-2872 or organize@cwa-union.org

You can also download this brochure to get more information:

Download "Welcome, MCI Employees!"
[Acrobat 188K]

Union Members:
Download the brochure and talk to former MCI employees about the benefits of a union contract.

(For bulk copies, contact Sarah Splitt, splitt@cwa-union.org or 202-434-1431)

Locals Spread the Word About Verizon Business

During the week of June 29, CWA and IBEW stewards and mobilizers across the country distributed tens of thousands of flyers to educate members about the threat posed by Verizon's wall.

"We want to welcome former MCI employees into our union," said District 2 Vice President Pete Catucci, "but instead of allowing that to happen, Verizon has used them to set up Verizon Business (VZB) and is sending work out of our bargaining units. We want to be partners with the company, but we cannot allow this to continue."

Even though some locations have not yet felt the direct impact of the creation of VZB as a non-union entity, locals in every area, from California to Virginia, from Washington state to Florida, from Maine to Texas, participated, recognizing that their members could be next.

Said Les Evans, Maryland Local 2108 president, "Service reps that used to handle Bank of America work have seen their work disappear. They've been told by managers that it has gone over to Verizon Business. If our people are not taking those orders, doing the design work or the installs, it's pretty plain that work our folks were doing has gone over to VZB." 

"Our people are seeing their work disappear," said District 13 CWA Representative Pam Tronsor. "They're receiving calls from the MCI reps asking how to write up service orders, asking them how to do their work."

Said Xavier Spencer, a Local 1109 shop steward in Brooklyn, "We need to do whatever is necessary to protect our jobs. We cannot allow the company to ignore our contract. We cannot allow the company to build a wall around us and take our work."

The flier graphically shows that, while about two-thirds of the company's revenue currently derives from bargaining unit work, if the current trend of shifting business customers to VZB continues, by 2007 that ratio will have been reversed.

CWA is pursuing discussions with the company as well as grievances and legal options, but said Catucci, "We also need to let the company know we will not sit quietly by and watch our work disappear." 

 

COLA Increase Due Under VZ-East Contracts

The VZ-East contracts negotiated in 2003 include Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) payable in 2006 and 2007 if inflation rises above a certain rate.

The 2006 increase will be 1.5%. This is in addition to the scheduled 2% base increase in August.

An additional COLA could be paid in 2007 if the CPI increases by more than 2% from May 2006 to May 2007.

We Want You!

We Want You!

to sign up your
co-workers for Unity@Verizon!

The more Verizon members we have on our list, the quicker we can share information and take action when it's needed.

Ask your co-workers to visit our subscription page or collect a list and fax it to Beatriz Woods at 202-434-1201.

Please be sure to note that the list is for Unity@Verizon and include your Local number. Remember to use home e-mail addresses.

IBEW & CWA Fight Telecom Redlining in New England and North Central

Campaigning Against "Rural Redlining"

  Meeting with
Gov. Balducci
  Anne Mussenden, Local 1400 VP and VZ service rep in Portland, ME, Local 1400 President Cheryl Ahern, Jen Nappi, assistant business manager of IBEW Local 2327, Gov. Baldacci, 2327 business manager Peter McLaughlin, 2327 assistant business manger, Steve Early, D1 AA to the VP, and e-board president Diane Winton.

Seventy-five IBEW and CWA mobilization activists met in Manchester, N.H., in late May  to launch their fight against Verizon's abandonment of northern New England.

Aided by state and local AFL-CIO labor bodies in Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire, the four locals involved are contacting elected officials, utility regulators, and consumer groups to explain why VZ's access line sell-off would be bad for labor, consumers, the regional economy, and the future of high-speed broad band access in rural areas.

Maine Gov. John Baldacci has already responded by writing to Verizon about his concerns, as has Maine Representative Thomas Allen, and the entire Vermont delegation to Congress, Representative Bernie Sanders, Senator Patrick Leahy, and Senator Jim Jeffords.

The "Stop the Sale" campaign will be gaining visibility and momentum over the summer, at public events and with a new website.

Excerpts from Gov. Balducci's letter to Seidenberg:

Such an action would not square with the responsibilities reasonably expected of a provider of telephone service.

If all providers were to follow this lead, rural areas would have poor service at best and potentially no phone service at all. For public health, safety and welfare reasons, this potential is unacceptable.

I am hopeful that Verizon intends to continue its successes in Maine with its great workforce.

 
 

In the Fall, the unions plan to introduce bills that would expand regulatory review of access line sales.

If VZ finds a buyer before then, CWA and IBEW will immediately intervene in PSB/PUC proceedings to oppose the deal. CWA and IBEW locals in the North Central region are also working on a strategic plan.

There is a Better Alternative!

Two years ago, Verizon tried to sell off all of its holdings in upstate New York--a $7 billion dollar deal that would have affected 2.5 million access lines and 5,500 jobs. Labor and the community rallied against this scheme, generating thousands of letters and phone calls to state legislators and the chairman of New York's Public Service Commission.

Excerpts from Vermont Congressional delegation's letter to Seidenberg:

The possible sale of Verizon's access lines throughout Vermont raises serious concerns about Verizon's commitment to bridging the digital divide found primarily in rural America -- and so evident in the most rural areas of our state. This is more than a matter of enabling rural customers to connect to the Internet so they can browse just like other Americans. High-speed Internet access is essential to the economic development of rural Vermont, and is integral to our state's plan to build healthly Vermont businesses for the new century.

 
 
CWA and IBEW members held workplace protests and lobby days in Albany. They got state, county, and municipal elected officials to speak out or adopt resolutions against the sale. Union-run radio and newspaper ads rallied public opinion against accepting "second-class phone service" in small towns and rural areas. In September, 2004, Verizon announced that it had "suspended" all activities related to the possible sale of access lines in the upstate region.

Locals in New England and North Central are adapting New York's successful strategies in their own campaigns.

CWA Technician Brent Cheney Killed on the Job

The electrocution death of a Verizon technician in Indiana, a member of CWA Local 4773, is being investigated by the state's Occupational Safety and Health authorities, as well as by the union and company.
  Brent Cheney
& Mark Campbell
 

Brent Cheney (left) and Mark Campbell make repairs in Elkhart, IN, in 2005.

Brent Cheney, 35, was working on the mainframe inside the Elkhart office, trying to fix a customer's cable problem, when he died May 26. Other workers were in the office but no one was in the area with him at the time of the incident. Local 4773 President Ed Lowdenslager said it appears that Cheney was on a moveable ladder along the mainframe, holding a high-voltage meter in one hand that helps determine trouble spots in pairs of cable. The electrocution may have occurred when Cheney reached for the cord that releases the ladder's brake. Lowdenslager said the cords used to be made of nylon but are now braided metal with plastic insulation. However, parts of the insulation had worn off.  After Cheney's co-workers found him and called for help, he was taken to Elkhart General Hospital where he was pronounced dead.

Cheney had worked for Verizon and been a Local 4773 member since August 1999. He was a former Navy Seal who loved diving and other sports. His survivors include his wife, Christine, and their 5-year-old daughter, Kaia. At CWA's July convention, Local 4773 President Ed Lowdenslager told Brent's story to the delegates, who collected donations for Christine and Kaia.

The precise cause of the accident is still under investigation. The company has not released its report to the union.  The CWA is very concerned with recent electrocutions and near misses.  Besides the electrocution of Brent Cheney, this year, there have been electrocutions in California and West Virginia. The CWA Occupational Safety and Health Department, along with staff in the districts, is looking into the reasons for these near misses and electrocutions and plans to release a report in the near future.

Retirees Continue Fight for Pension Increase

[Edited version of RMC Chair Ed Creegan's reply to Verizon VP Marc Reed]
 
To: Marc Reed, Vice President for Human Resources, Verizon 
From: Ed Creegan, National Chairman, CWA Retired Members Council
 
Thank you for taking the time and effort to respond to my latest email to you and Chairman Seidenberg.  
 
In the 13 years that I have been involved as a CWA Retiree leader for all Verizon Union retirees (I also speak on behalf of IBEW retirees with their permission), my number one comment has been and will continue to be that I find two attitudes most offensive to retirees and all seniors. Those two attitudes are always taken by Chairman Seidenberg and his spokespersons such as you. You clearly assume that all retirees and seniors are absolutely stupid and you address and treat us accordingly, including me as their leader. The other attitude is that you and chairman Seidenberg are totally disrespectful of all Retirees including me as their leader. That is the main difference between when I was a Union officer with the ability to give the company grief when they were unreasonable to us and now as a Retiree leader when the company has no fear or concern about retirees
"You and Chairman Seidenberg are totally disrespectful of all Retirees."

I do not know if you have ever been involved in the bargaining process but I have on eight different committees. It was almost comical how the company would open their bargaining process. They would always give a detailed speech, similar to yours, filled with unsubstantiated facts and half-truths. They treated us as if we had no knowledge of their business so they thought they could say whatever they wanted to convince us that they were in deep financial trouble. At the first day of each new bargaining session, I would offer to take up a collection so they could survive another day. 

I will respond to some of the comments you made that were mostly inaccurate or half truths. 
"Today all the company wants to do is to try to get rid of CWA and starve the Verizon retirees and it is not going to happen."

You stated that I did not recognize the special payments made to retirees in the year 2000. Wrong again: I thanked Chairman Seidenberg on numerous occasions at shareholders meetings and in writing for the 2000 special payments to retirees. However, I did not feel that we should remain on our knees thanking the company for the remainder that the average received by retirees was $7,500 is a total distortion, because obviously you included top-level management who received significantly more than Union retirees. 

Your comment on increased minimum pension increases was also a mistruth and a distortion. I did thank the company for that change, although you as usual left out an important point: that the $700 minimum applied to retirees with over 30 years of service. Of all of the Verizon retiree groups I have addressed since the increase in minimum pensions I have not met anyone it affected. I am sure it affected a few retirees who retired many years ago. 

As to your comments on medical which you and Mr. Seidenberg imply we should be so grateful that we should never think about asking for a pension increase for the remainder of our retired lives -- which I am sure that you and Ivan hope will be very short -- so as to do the only thing you live for: "Saving the company money."

"I will give you a lesson on the collective bargaining process. You seem to be implying that only because of the generosity of the company and its leaders that we have medical coverage. Well, guess what? Every nickel of our medical cost we earned. The union always had the option of getting higher wage increases if we decided not to improve our benefits."

One final misleading insult. You as a company totally discriminate against retirees on Medicare by forcing most of us now and all of us in the future to pay for most of our Medicare part "B" coverage and recently hired and future employees to pay for all of their Medicare part "B" coverage.  You try to take credit for removing most of the Medicare part "B" total repayment as if we should be grateful that we got anything. Rather than taking credit, you and your greedy partners should be totally ashamed. Medicare part "B" costs are now $170 a month for a couple and will increase to $190 a month in January. Oh, I forgot to mention that most of us will be getting $27.90 a month from the company so it will only cost us an additional $162 a month. So let's see, a retiree who should continue to have total medical coverage reaches age 65 with an $7,000-a-year pension will be charged about $1,944 a year more that when he/she was paying at age 64 with a resultant pension after the medicare part "B" deductible of $5,056. Well below the poverty line and falling. Aren't you and Ivan very proud of yourselves and your heartless board of directors? Even Lucent with its unbelievable financial problems far exceeds your reimbursements for Medicare Part "B".  Verizon East also has gone the longest without a pension increase for Retirees.

I assure you and Mr. Seidenberg and his board of Union and Retiree haters that I will do whatever I can to stop the sick, heartless abuse of your retirees and our Unions, both CWA and IBEW, will totally support whatever action we feel is appropriate.

Cable Telecom Workers Win Contract After Hanging Tough for Five Years

"One Day Longer"

Verizon's not the only anti-union company in telecom. Comcast, the country's largest cable company and now a provider of cable telephony, has fought viciously against its workers' efforts to organize and to bargain contracts.

"I felt it was a privilege to work with people like that.

"I've been doing organizing for 20 years and to see people just keep fighting and fighting, even though the company tried to beat them down so much — I just can't say enough positive things about them."

-- CWA D-13 A.A. Marge Krueger

Five years of solidarity, persistence and community support have led to three groundbreaking contracts for embattled Comcast workers near Pittsburgh.

Over the past two weeks, workers represented by CWA Local 13000 have ratified contracts covering 350 technical unit employees in the South Hills, East Hills and Corliss bargaining units. The victories follow CWA contracts ratified last fall by South Hills service representatives and Westmoreland technicians and warehouse workers.

CWA's hard-won success against Comcast in western Pennsylvania has given the area the country's largest number of organized workers at the notorious union-busting cable company.

"We could not be prouder of our members at Comcast, our Local 13000 leaders and our staff for never backing down even as Comcast illegally fired workers, mounted decert campaigns and tried every other trick in the book to keep CWA out," CWA President Larry Cohen said. "These contracts represent an historic victory for us."

"Congratulations to every person involved with these wins, from the membership, local officers and the executive board of Local 13000 to all of the District 13 staff involved, especially Administrative Assistant Marge Krueger," said District Vice President Jim Short. "These workers truly wanted a say in their workplace and were willing to outlast Comcast one day longer."

Said Krueger, the chief organizer and negotiator, "one day longer" was the mantra that symbolized the workers' determination throughout the long fight.

The contracts have different expiration dates between two and three years from now. Krueger said they all include an initial wage increase of 2.5 to 3.5 percent and a $700 signing bonus, and a second-year raise of 2.6 percent. While health care costs for workers will rise in two increments, they will be offset in part by additional wage increases of .5 percent. Workers will maintain their paid time off and won a provision that the company can't schedule shifts after 7:30 p.m.

The CWA-represented units were first organized and certified in 2001, when they were owned by AT&T. A year later, AT&T Broadband merged with Comcast and the battle for recognition and a contract became even tougher.

"We have had seven different company attorneys who tried to start bargaining from the beginning each time there was a change," Krueger said. "Bargaining only occurred in between four elections, layoffs and numerous unfair labor practice charges."

CWA-sponsored radio ads, public support from the Pittsburgh City Council and other political leaders, AFL-CIO support and a town hall meeting hosted by Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) all helped increase pressure on Comcast to bargain.

CWA members of Locals 13000 and 13500, as well as other locals around the country, lent their support, even making home visits to Comcast workers to help them understand the benefits of joining the union.

Krueger said she's been bowled over by the workers who fought so hard for union representation and contracts.

"I felt it was a privilege to work with people like that," she said. "I've been doing organizing for 20 years and to see people just keep fighting and fighting, even though the company tried to beat them down so much -- I just can't say enough positive things about them."

Web links in this issue:

Visit Unity@Verizon on the web for more:

If you'd rather receive only periodic updates when we need you to take action or there's significant news, please reply to this message and tell us "periodic."

(What's happening in your area?
Send information and photos to unityatverizon@cwa-union.org and we'll publish them here.)

Fighting for Verizon's Future:
Hometown Jobs & Quality Service

This message was sent to Please take just a minute to verify that we've got the correct information for you.

Are you a CWA member or retiree? Unknown - please update
Your CWA local number: Unknown - please update
Your Verizon bargaining unit: Unknown - please update
Your state & zip code: Unknown - please update  Unknown - please update (so we can send you information relevant to your elected officials)

If any of this information is incorrect, our apologies. Please update your information by clicking here: http://www.unionvoice.org/cwa_unity_verizon/smp.tcl?nkey=na47witd7& or by replying to this e-mail.