 |
|
July 28, 2006 - Please post
& share |
Together
We'll Tear It Down!
|
 |
| |
We need
to break through the wall that Verizon is building around
Verizon Business -- a wall that limits union wages, benefits,
and work to the
core. | The wall
that Verizon is building around VZ Business is a BAD
idea. Bad for workers, bad for customers, bad for
shareholders, and bad for business.
Verizon is using VZ Business -- and its non-union working
conditions -- to perform communications work usually done at
union rates and benefits.
Clerical, tech, service, and operator work is being moved out
of the bargaining unit -- even for non-Enterprise customers.
- If small and medium business customers purchase MCI platform
products, such as VoIP, their DA and operator calls will be
handled at former MCI call centers.
- Orders for POTS circuits coming to union service reps for
one huge customer have dropped by 90% since the merger.
- In Washington state, tech work for Washington Mutual bank
will be performed by VZB employees.
Verizon's BAD plan sets the stage for labor
unrest -- the last thing Wall Street wants to hear when it's
already jittery about Verizon's FiOS vs. cable.
It's up to us to get Verizon to change this BAD
plan.
Educate your co-workers, report info to your Local,
and mobilize!
It'll Take All of
Us!
Remember: Please report any examples
of VZ Enterprise or Wholesale work that has been shifted to VZ
Business, or work that would have come to the bargaining unit in
the past but is now going directly to Verizon Business.
Also, please identify any business process, location, CO,
or customer premise where our work is co-located with VZ
Business, including plant.
Send the information to unityatverizon@cwa-union.org |
In This
Issue
Together We'll Tear It
Down!
Locals Spread the Word
About Verizon Business
IBEW & CWA Fight
Telecom Redlining
Retirees Fight for
Pension Increase
CWA
Technician Brent Cheney Killed on the Job
"One Day Longer": Cable
Workers Hang Tough
COLA Increase to Be Paid
Under VZ-East Contracts |
|
Verizon Business employees: Don't stand
for inferior treatment!
Join with us and protect wages, benefits, job security, and
working conditions for all Verizon workers.
To learn more, visit us on the web at
www.cwa-union.org/verizon or contact CWA at 800-424-2872 or
organize@cwa-union.org
You can also download this brochure to get more
information:

Download "Welcome, MCI
Employees!" [Acrobat
188K]
Union Members: Download the brochure and
talk to former MCI employees about the benefits of a union
contract.
(For bulk copies, contact Sarah Splitt,
splitt@cwa-union.org or
202-434-1431) |
Locals Spread the Word About Verizon
Business
During the week of June 29, CWA and IBEW
stewards and mobilizers across the country distributed tens of
thousands of flyers to educate members about the threat posed by
Verizon's wall.
"We want to welcome former MCI employees into our union,"
said District 2 Vice President Pete Catucci, "but instead of
allowing that to happen, Verizon has used them to set up Verizon
Business (VZB) and is sending work out of our bargaining units.
We want to be partners with the company, but we cannot allow
this to continue."
Even though some locations have not yet felt the direct
impact of the creation of VZB as a non-union entity, locals in
every area, from California to Virginia, from Washington state
to Florida, from Maine to Texas, participated, recognizing that
their members could be next.
Said Les Evans, Maryland Local
2108 president, "Service reps that used to handle Bank of
America work have seen their work disappear. They've been told
by managers that it has gone over to Verizon Business. If our
people are not taking those orders, doing the design work or the
installs, it's pretty plain that work our folks were doing has
gone over to VZB."
"Our people are seeing their work disappear," said District
13 CWA Representative Pam Tronsor. "They're receiving calls from
the MCI reps asking how to write up service orders, asking them
how to do their work."
Said Xavier Spencer, a Local 1109 shop steward in Brooklyn,
"We need to do whatever is necessary to protect our jobs. We
cannot allow the company to ignore our contract. We cannot allow
the company to build a wall around us and take our work." The
flier graphically shows that, while about two-thirds of the
company's revenue currently derives from bargaining unit work,
if the current trend of shifting business customers to VZB
continues, by 2007 that ratio will have been reversed.
CWA is pursuing discussions with the company as well as
grievances and legal options, but said Catucci, "We also need to
let the company know we will not sit quietly by and watch our
work disappear."
|
COLA Increase Due Under
VZ-East Contracts
The VZ-East contracts negotiated in 2003 include
Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) payable in 2006 and 2007 if
inflation rises above a certain rate.
The 2006 increase will be 1.5%. This is in addition to the
scheduled 2% base increase in August.
An additional COLA could be paid in 2007 if the
CPI increases by more than 2% from May 2006 to May
2007. |
|
We Want
You!
to sign up your
co-workers for Unity@Verizon!
The more Verizon members we have on our list, the quicker we
can share information and take action when it's needed.
Ask your co-workers to visit our
subscription page or collect a list and fax it to Beatriz
Woods at 202-434-1201.
Please be sure to note that the list is for
Unity@Verizon and include your Local number. Remember to use home e-mail
addresses. |
IBEW & CWA
Fight Telecom Redlining in New England and North
Central
Campaigning Against "Rural Redlining"
| |
 |
| |
Anne Mussenden, Local 1400 VP
and VZ service rep in Portland, ME, Local 1400 President Cheryl
Ahern, Jen Nappi, assistant business manager of IBEW Local 2327,
Gov. Baldacci, 2327 business manager Peter McLaughlin, 2327
assistant business manger, Steve Early, D1 AA to the VP, and
e-board president Diane Winton.
|
Seventy-five IBEW and CWA mobilization activists met in
Manchester, N.H., in late May to launch their fight
against Verizon's abandonment of northern New England.
Aided by state and local AFL-CIO labor bodies in Maine,
Vermont, and New Hampshire, the four locals involved are
contacting elected officials, utility regulators, and consumer
groups to explain why VZ's access line sell-off would be bad for
labor, consumers, the regional economy, and the future of
high-speed broad band access in rural areas.
Maine Gov. John Baldacci has already responded by writing to
Verizon about his concerns, as has Maine Representative Thomas
Allen, and the entire Vermont delegation to Congress,
Representative Bernie Sanders, Senator Patrick Leahy, and
Senator Jim Jeffords.
The "Stop the Sale" campaign will be gaining visibility and
momentum over the summer, at public events and with a new
website.
Excerpts from Gov. Balducci's letter
to Seidenberg:
Such an action would not square with the
responsibilities reasonably expected of a provider of telephone
service.
If all providers were to follow this lead,
rural areas would have poor service at best and potentially no
phone service at all. For public health, safety and welfare
reasons, this potential is unacceptable.
I am hopeful that Verizon intends to
continue its successes in Maine with its great
workforce. |
|
| |
In the Fall, the unions plan to introduce bills that would
expand regulatory review of access line sales.
If VZ finds a buyer before then, CWA and IBEW will
immediately intervene in PSB/PUC proceedings to oppose the deal.
CWA and IBEW locals in the North Central region are also working
on a strategic plan.
There is a Better Alternative!
Two years ago, Verizon tried to sell off all of its holdings
in upstate New York--a $7 billion dollar deal that would have
affected 2.5 million access lines and 5,500 jobs. Labor and the
community rallied against this scheme, generating thousands of
letters and phone calls to state legislators and the chairman of
New York's Public Service Commission.
Excerpts from Vermont Congressional
delegation's letter to Seidenberg:
The possible sale of Verizon's access
lines throughout Vermont raises serious concerns about Verizon's
commitment to bridging the digital divide found primarily in
rural America -- and so evident in the most rural areas of our
state. This is more than a matter of enabling rural customers to
connect to the Internet so they can browse just like other
Americans. High-speed Internet access is essential to the
economic development of rural Vermont, and is integral to our
state's plan to build healthly Vermont businesses for the new
century. |
|
| | CWA and IBEW members
held workplace protests and lobby days in Albany. They got
state, county, and municipal elected officials to speak out or
adopt resolutions against the sale. Union-run radio and
newspaper ads rallied public opinion against accepting
"second-class phone service" in small towns and rural areas. In
September, 2004, Verizon announced that it had "suspended" all
activities related to the possible sale of access lines in the
upstate region.
Locals in New England and North Central are adapting New
York's successful strategies in their own
campaigns. |
CWA Technician Brent
Cheney Killed on the Job
The electrocution death of a Verizon technician in Indiana, a
member of CWA Local 4773, is being investigated by the state's
Occupational Safety and Health authorities, as well as by the
union and company.
| |
 |
| |
Brent Cheney (left) and Mark Campbell make
repairs in Elkhart, IN, in
2005. |
Brent Cheney, 35, was working on the mainframe inside the
Elkhart office, trying to fix a customer's cable problem, when
he died May 26. Other workers were in the office but no one was
in the area with him at the time of the incident. Local
4773 President Ed Lowdenslager said it appears that Cheney was
on a moveable ladder along the mainframe, holding a high-voltage
meter in one hand that helps determine trouble spots in pairs of
cable. The electrocution may have occurred when Cheney reached
for the cord that releases the ladder's brake. Lowdenslager said
the cords used to be made of nylon but are now braided metal
with plastic insulation. However, parts of the insulation had
worn off. After Cheney's co-workers found him and called
for help, he was taken to Elkhart General Hospital where he was
pronounced dead.
Cheney had worked for Verizon and been a Local 4773 member
since August 1999. He was a former Navy Seal who loved diving
and other sports. His survivors include his wife, Christine, and
their 5-year-old daughter, Kaia. At CWA's July
convention, Local 4773 President Ed Lowdenslager told
Brent's story to the delegates, who collected donations for
Christine and Kaia.
The precise cause of the accident is still under
investigation. The company has not released its report to the
union. The CWA is very concerned with recent
electrocutions and near misses. Besides the electrocution
of Brent Cheney, this year, there have been electrocutions in
California and West Virginia. The CWA Occupational Safety and
Health Department, along with staff in the districts, is looking
into the reasons for these near misses and electrocutions and
plans to release a report in the near future. |
Retirees Continue Fight for Pension
Increase
[Edited version of RMC Chair Ed Creegan's
reply to Verizon VP Marc Reed]
To: Marc Reed, Vice President for
Human Resources, Verizon
From: Ed Creegan, National Chairman, CWA
Retired Members Council
Thank you for taking the time and effort to respond to my
latest email to you and Chairman Seidenberg.
In the 13 years that I have been involved as a CWA Retiree
leader for all Verizon Union retirees (I also speak on behalf of
IBEW retirees with their permission), my number one comment has
been and will continue to be that I find two attitudes most
offensive to retirees and all seniors. Those two attitudes are
always taken by Chairman Seidenberg and his spokespersons such
as you. You clearly assume that all retirees and seniors
are absolutely stupid and you address and treat us accordingly,
including me as their leader. The other attitude is that
you and chairman Seidenberg are totally disrespectful of all
Retirees including me as their leader. That is the main
difference between when I was a Union officer with the ability
to give the company grief when they were unreasonable to us and
now as a Retiree leader when the company has no fear or concern
about retirees
| "You
and Chairman Seidenberg are totally disrespectful of all
Retirees." |
I do not know if you have ever been involved in the
bargaining process but I have on eight different
committees. It was almost comical how the company would
open their bargaining process. They would always give a detailed
speech, similar to yours, filled with unsubstantiated facts and
half-truths. They treated us as if we had no knowledge of
their business so they thought they could say whatever they
wanted to convince us that they were in deep financial
trouble. At the first day of each new bargaining session, I
would offer to take up a collection so they could survive
another day.
I will respond to some of the comments you made that were
mostly inaccurate or half truths.
| "Today all the company wants to do is to try
to get rid of CWA and starve the Verizon retirees and it is not
going to
happen." |
You stated that I did not recognize the special payments made
to retirees in the year 2000. Wrong again: I thanked
Chairman Seidenberg on numerous occasions at shareholders
meetings and in writing for the 2000 special payments to
retirees. However, I did not feel that we should remain on
our knees thanking the company for the remainder that
the average received by retirees was $7,500 is a total
distortion, because obviously you included top-level management
who received significantly more than Union retirees.
Your comment on increased minimum pension increases was also
a mistruth and a distortion. I did thank the company for
that change, although you as usual left out an important point:
that the $700 minimum applied to retirees with over 30 years of
service. Of all of the Verizon retiree groups I have
addressed since the increase in minimum pensions I have not met
anyone it affected. I am sure it affected a few retirees
who retired many years ago.
As to your comments on medical which you and Mr. Seidenberg
imply we should be so grateful that we should never think about
asking for a pension increase for the remainder of our retired
lives -- which I am sure that you and Ivan hope will be very
short -- so as to do the only thing you live for: "Saving the
company money."
| "I
will give you a lesson on the collective bargaining
process. You seem to be implying that only because of the
generosity of the company and its leaders that we have medical
coverage. Well, guess what? Every nickel of our medical cost we
earned. The union always had the option of getting higher wage
increases if we decided not to improve our
benefits." |
One final misleading insult. You as a company totally
discriminate against retirees on Medicare by forcing most of us
now and all of us in the future to pay for most of our Medicare
part "B" coverage and recently hired and future employees to pay
for all of their Medicare part "B" coverage. You try to
take credit for removing most of the Medicare part "B" total
repayment as if we should be grateful that we got
anything. Rather than taking credit, you and your greedy
partners should be totally ashamed. Medicare part "B" costs
are now $170 a month for a couple and will increase to $190 a
month in January. Oh, I forgot to mention that most of us
will be getting $27.90 a month from the company so it will only
cost us an additional $162 a month. So let's see, a retiree
who should continue to have total medical coverage reaches age
65 with an $7,000-a-year pension will be charged about $1,944 a
year more that when he/she was paying at age 64 with a resultant
pension after the medicare part "B" deductible of $5,056. Well
below the poverty line and falling. Aren't you and Ivan
very proud of yourselves and your heartless board of
directors? Even Lucent with its unbelievable financial
problems far exceeds your reimbursements for Medicare Part
"B". Verizon East also has gone the longest without a
pension increase for Retirees.
I assure you and Mr. Seidenberg and his board of Union and
Retiree haters that I will do whatever I can to stop the sick,
heartless abuse of your retirees and our Unions, both CWA and
IBEW, will totally support whatever action we feel is
appropriate. |
Cable Telecom Workers Win Contract
After Hanging Tough for Five Years
"One Day Longer"
Verizon's not the only anti-union company in telecom.
Comcast, the country's largest cable company and now a provider
of cable telephony, has fought viciously against its workers'
efforts to organize and to bargain contracts.
|
"I felt it was a privilege to
work with people like that.
"I've been doing organizing
for 20 years and to see people just keep fighting and fighting,
even though the company tried to beat them down so much —
I just can't say enough positive things about
them."
-- CWA D-13 A.A. Marge Krueger
|
Five years of solidarity, persistence and community support
have led to three groundbreaking contracts for embattled Comcast
workers near Pittsburgh.
Over the past two weeks, workers represented by CWA Local
13000 have ratified contracts covering 350 technical unit
employees in the South Hills, East Hills and Corliss bargaining
units. The victories follow CWA contracts ratified last fall by
South Hills service representatives and Westmoreland technicians
and warehouse workers.
CWA's hard-won success against Comcast in western
Pennsylvania has given the area the country's largest number of
organized workers at the notorious union-busting cable
company.
"We could not be prouder of our members at Comcast, our Local
13000 leaders and our staff for never backing down even as
Comcast illegally fired workers, mounted decert campaigns
and tried every other trick in the book to keep CWA out," CWA
President Larry Cohen said. "These contracts represent an
historic victory for us."
"Congratulations to every person involved with these wins,
from the membership, local officers and the executive board of
Local 13000 to all of the District 13 staff involved, especially
Administrative Assistant Marge Krueger," said District Vice
President Jim Short. "These workers truly wanted a say in their
workplace and were willing to outlast Comcast one day
longer."
Said Krueger, the chief organizer and negotiator, "one day
longer" was the mantra that symbolized the workers'
determination throughout the long fight.
The contracts have different expiration dates between two and
three years from now. Krueger said they all include an initial
wage increase of 2.5 to 3.5 percent and a $700 signing bonus,
and a second-year raise of 2.6 percent. While health care costs
for workers will rise in two increments, they will be offset in
part by additional wage increases of .5 percent. Workers will
maintain their paid time off and won a provision that the
company can't schedule shifts after 7:30 p.m.
The CWA-represented units were first organized and certified
in 2001, when they were owned by AT&T. A year later,
AT&T Broadband merged with Comcast and the battle for
recognition and a contract became even tougher.
"We have had seven different company attorneys who tried to
start bargaining from the beginning each time there was a
change," Krueger said. "Bargaining only occurred in between four
elections, layoffs and numerous unfair labor practice
charges."
CWA-sponsored radio ads, public support from the Pittsburgh
City Council and other political leaders, AFL-CIO support and a
town hall meeting hosted by Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) all helped
increase pressure on Comcast to bargain.
CWA members of Locals 13000 and 13500, as well as other
locals around the country, lent their support, even making home
visits to Comcast workers to help them understand the benefits
of joining the union.
Krueger said she's been bowled over by the workers who fought
so hard for union representation and contracts.
"I felt it was a privilege to work with people like that,"
she said. "I've been doing organizing for 20 years and to see
people just keep fighting and fighting, even though the company
tried to beat them down so much -- I just can't say enough
positive things about them." |
 |
|
Web links in this issue:
|
|
Visit Unity@Verizon on the web for more:
If you'd rather receive
only periodic updates when we need you to take action or there's
significant news, please reply to this message and tell us
"periodic." |
(What's happening in your area? Send information and
photos to unityatverizon@cwa-union.org
and we'll publish them here.) |
Fighting for Verizon's
Future: Hometown Jobs & Quality
Service |
|
This message was sent to Please take just a
minute to verify that we've got the correct information for
you.
Are you a CWA member or retiree? Unknown - please update Your
CWA local number: Unknown - please update
Your Verizon bargaining unit: Unknown - please update
Your state & zip code: Unknown - please update
Unknown - please update (so we can send you
information relevant to your elected officials)
If any of this information is incorrect, our
apologies. Please update your information by clicking here: http://www.unionvoice.org/cwa_unity_verizon/smp.tcl?nkey=na47witd7& or by replying to this
e-mail. |
|
|