WASHINGTON (AP) —
Labor, riding high after quick wins with President
Barack Obama, faces the harsh reality that the
Democratic-controlled Congress will not find it easy to push
more fiercely contested legislation to improve the status of
workers or the unions trying to organize them.
Obama on
Friday issued executive orders that union officials say will
undo Bush administration policies favoring employers. Among the
orders, federal contractors would be required to offer jobs to
current workers when contracts change, and they would be
prevented from receiving reimbursement for expenses meant to
influence worker decisions on joining unions or engaging in
collective bargaining.
A day earlier, the new president
signed the first bill of his administration, the Lilly Ledbetter
Fair Pay Act, which allows more leeway for women and others
seeking justice over pay discrimination.
"What a
difference a pro-worker Congress and pro-worker president make,"
SEIU International secretary-treasurer Anna Burger said in a
statement before she attended the signing ceremony for the
Ledbetter bill.
But no one, including the Democrats who
control Congress, are predicting that other labor rights
priorities will sail through with the same speed as the
Ledbetter bill.
When asked what's next on the labor
agenda, Democratic leaders instead turn the conversation to
bigger bills well beyond the scope of worker rights, such as the
$819 billion economic stimulus plan the House passed or health
care changes they hope to put together in coming
months.
The stimulus plan contains provisions on job
creation, job training, health care and extending unemployment
benefits. "We think that that is a workplace fairness piece of
legislation," House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi said.
On specific labor legislation, Democrats
have already indicated they will move with caution.
On
Jan. 9, the House passed the Ledbetter bill together with a
second bill aimed at helping women fight workplace
discrimination by putting gender-based discrimination on an
equal footing with other forms of discrimination in seeking
punitive damages. Republicans criticized that bill as a gift to
trial lawyers, and Senate Democrats concerned that GOP
opposition could doom the package put it aside, taking up only
the Ledbetter bill.
The sparks generated by the companion
bill are nothing compared to what could be the most spectacular,
and most costly, fight of the year, over a bill making it easier
for unions to organize workers.
The card check bill
— hailed by supporters as the "Employee Free Choice Act"
— would take away a company's right to demand a secret
ballot election on whether workers want collective bargaining
representative by a union. Instead, a union would be certified
when the National Labor Relations Board finds that a majority of
workers have signed cards designating the union as their
bargaining representative.
Organized labor sees the bill
as crucial to its recruitment drives. Unions represent about one
in eight workers today, down from about one in five 25 years
ago, although membership did increase slightly in
2008.
Business groups have vowed to do whatever it takes
to defeat the bill.
Rhonda Bentz of the Coalition for a
Democratic Workplace, consisting of more than 500 groups
opposing the bill, said they bought several million dollars in
ads during the last session of Congress, and plan to spend a
similar amount this year.
Keith Smith, director of labor
policy for the National Association of Manufacturers, said some
Democrats are realizing that "this is a live-fire exercise"
where they don't have the cover of the veto threat issued by
former President
George W. Bush.
On the other side, American Rights at
Work, a labor advocacy group, this month launched a $3 million
ad campaign in favor of the bill. "A substantial majority of
Americans see the Employee Free Choice Act as part of the common
sense solutions critical to economic recovery and reinvigorating
the middle class," said the group's executive director Mary Beth
Maxwe

