Tuesday, October 28,
2009
Washington
is the smart choice for Boeing 787 work, IAM
says
In a statement released Tuesday,
the International Association of Machinists
says, "Instead of spending another $750 million to collect the
incentives the South Carolina legislature proposed today (on top
of the $1 billion Boeing already spent to purchase that plant
earlier this year), we would all be better off if Boeing made
the rational decision, with the least amount of risk and best
chance of success by simply continuing to work with us. ...
Boeing faces a lot of challenges right now,
and its only chance for success is to form partnerships with the
people who can help it. We are those partners. We can -- and
should be -- the force that drives Boeing forward in the 21st
century." Read
more.
More Boeing
news:
► In
today's Seattle Times -- Boeing talks fall apart;
S.C. likely to get 787 line -- Talks between
the Machinists union and Boeing over the second 787 line for
Everett are effectively dead, says a source. Boeing appears
close to choosing Charleston, S.C. In a special session of the
South Carolina Legislature, a Senate committee approved a lavish
incentive package for Boeing if it picks Charleston, invests
$750 million and creates 3,800 new jobs in the state within
seven years. That large number suggests that if Charleston does
win the 787 line, Boeing will expand there quickly and add
substantial work beyond the 787.
►
At SeattleTimes.com -- Murray making last-ditch effort
to save 2nd 787 line for Everett
-- "The Senator has placed calls to the Machinists and Boeing,
asking them to sit down in her office," says her spokeswoman.
"The machinists have agreed. We are waiting to hear back from
the company." Murray was involved in facilitating talks between
the two sides over the weekend.
► In
today's Seattle Times -- Boeing, Machinists and denial (Danny Westneat column) -- Take away
all the union-bashing or management second-guessing. At the core
of this breakup drama is a cold statistic: The average pay of
the 787 fuselage line workers in Charleston, S.C., is $14 an
hour. Boeing Machinists here average $28 an hour. So Boeing is
paying less to build airplanes in South Carolina than we pay in
Seattle for cutting hair or shelving 3-pound jars of olives at
Costco.
►
In today's Everett Herald -- Boeing suitor in S. Carolina sweetens the deal for
787 line -- As Boeing employees here strive to get the 787
back on track, lawmakers 3,000 miles away work to steal away the
company's second production line.
►
In today's (Charleston) Post-Courier -- Hush-hush talks held to attract company no one
will identify -- South Carolina laid out
its cards for the first time in the high-stakes effort to
persuade Boeing to expand in Charleston, although legislators refused to name the company they are
courting.
►
In today's News Tribune -- It's the end game for Machinists, Boeing
(editorial) -- The nasty
reality underlying this situation is Boeing’s position. It
appears to view its Northwest birthplace with no more sympathy
than it might Malaysia or Mongolia. And its long history of
hostilities with the Machinists seems quite sufficient to entice
it to Charleston. It’s possible the company has already
decided on S.C. and intends to blame the decision on the
Machinists. We hope not.
Health
care news:
► In today's NY
Times -- Democrats divided over
Reid proposal for public option -- Senate Democrats voiced deep disagreements over the
idea of a government-run health insurance plan, suggesting that
the decision by the Majority Leader Harry Reid to include a
public plan in major health care legislation had failed, at
least initially, to unite his caucus.
►
At Huffington Post -- Reid open to majority vote to beat health-care
filibuster -- The process known as
budget reconciliation only requires a simple majority -- and can
not be filibustered -- meaning Sen. Reid would need only 50
Democrats plus a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Joe Biden
to declare victory. Is he still considering going that way?
"Sure, it's always an option," Reid
said.
►
In today's Washington Post -- Health reform's Chevy tax (Harold Meyerson column) -- In 2013,
the Senate's proposed tax on "Cadillac" health plans will apply
to an estimated 19% of individual plans and 14% of family plans.
But by 2019, it will sock 34% of individual plans and 31% of
family plans. Last time I looked, a third of American motorists
were not driving Cadillacs.
►
At SeattlePI.com -- Holding insurance companies accountable,
finally (Rep. Jim McDermott column) --
The State of Washington and several other
states have passed laws in support of patient rights, but they
are unenforceable because of ERISA. Call it patient rights,
consumer protection, fairness or accountability, this insurance
company exemption is wrong and that's why I introduced
legislation (H.R. 3295) to correct this gross injustice. I
believe this is something we can deliver immediately to the
American people as part of health care reform.
►
In today's Seattle Times -- Repeal the insurance industry's exemption from
antitrust laws (editorial) --
A reform-minded Congress should begin the
long road back toward regulation of the nation's financial
system by repealing the health-insurance industry's exemption
from antitrust laws. How the industry cozily sets prices and
divides up markets is not subject to federal scrutiny.
Meanwhile, a fat and sassy industry obstructs attempts to
rethink how this country provides health care to those who do
not have it, or pay ever higher premiums for less and less
coverage.
Election news:
► In
today's Olympian -- Poll shows I-1033 trailing, Ref. 71
ahead -- The Washington Poll shows Tim
Eyman's Initiative1033 is losing 46% to 41%,
with 13% undecided, among registered voters. Likely voters said
they intend to vote no by a 49-40 margin. Ref. 71 is winning by a 56-39 margin
among registered voters.
► In the
(Aberdeen) Daily World -- Initiative 1033 would slash more from college
budget -- If I-1033 passes, Grays
Harbor College could see its budget cut by about $424,000 in
2011, then $1.1 million in 2015, according to the State Board of
Community and Technical Colleges.
►
In today's Seattle Times -- Judge declines to suspend rules for Ref. 71
contributions -- A judge has denied an emergency request
that would have allowed opponents of Referendum 71 to accept
large donations this late in the campaign.
►
In today's Seattle Times -- Ref. 71 opponents resort to distractions
(editorial) -- Groups
working against a sensible expansion of Washington's
domestic-partnership law are desperate to change the subject.
Ignore the hyperventilating arm wavers.
► At
SeattlePI.com -- UW poll: Constantine leads Hutchison, Mallahan
leads McGinn -- The survey yielded one fascinating
development. Mallahan and McGinn were tied during the portion of
the poll taken during Oct. 14-20. After McGinn's apparent
flip-flop on the Alaskan Way deep-bored tunnel replacement,
subsequent polling showed Mallahan ahead 45% to
29%.
Local
news:
► In
today's Seattle Times -- State lawmakers should meet soon to deal with
budget imbalance (Sen. Joe Zarelli
column) -- With the budget already $1.2
billion out of balance, the longer lawmakers wait, the deeper
will the cuts eventually have to go. Trouble
is, soon there will be nothing to force lawmakers to reduce
spending. When the Legislature convenes Jan. 11, the majority
party can do what it could not in 2008 or 2009: toss I-960 and
raise taxes all on its own. No vote by the people, no bipartisan
support or "public conversation" required, just one late-night
legislative roll call and those tax-hike protections vanish.
History says bet on it.
►
In today's Daily News -- Cowlitz commissioners invoke "substantial need"
clause of I-747 -- For the first time, the county has
declared a “substantial need” to avoid a budget
crisis that would have been caused by the voter-approved
measure.
►
In today's Daily News -- Demand high for Longview Fibre's newest recycled
paper -- Fibre has added about 40 jobs over the past year.
The company shed 40% of its workforce in 2007 and 2008 and now
employs about 1,040.
►
In today's News Tribune -- Gig Harbor preliminary budget calls for more
layoffs -- More employee layoffs (5.5 jobs) are needed to
balance its 2010 budget.
►
In today's Everett Herald -- Keep services in mind when cursing taxes
(John Burbank column) --
It is easy to swear under your breath as you make out your
property tax check, but that money is going to our government
for education, parks, roads, police, and fire protection, among
other public services. No one else is going to make sure these
services are available to you.
National news:
► In
today's Bellingham Herald -- Unemployed hope Congress
extends benefits again -- Wayne Ryan, a carpenter from
Bonney Lake, and Benay Doolittle, an information technology
worker from Kennewick, are among the nearly 331,000 unemployed
in Washington state. A year ago there were fewer than 200,000.
Theirs are the faces behind the numbers. They shared their
stories of being down and out through no fault of their own as
Congress considers whether to extend unemployment benefits for a
third time since the recession began.
► From AP --
Groups call for balance in
labor, immigration laws --
Workplace immigration
raids during the Bush administration interfered with ongoing
labor investigations and allowed employers to exploit workers
who complained about conditions on the job, says a report
released Tuesday. The stepped-up immigration enforcement came at
the expense of rigorous enforcement of labor protections that
are guaranteed to all workers regardless of immigration status.
(See yesterday's posting: Immigration
enforcement has interfered with workers'
rights.)
►
In today's NY Times -- Union vote goes against cuts at Ford -- Ford
workers are rejecting the third round of concessions in two
years. UAW chapters have turned down changes that include a
six-year wage freeze for new workers and a provision bars the
union from striking for better pay and benefits through
2015.
►
In today's LA Times -- Plan would end bailouts for firms deemed "too big
to fail" -- Under the Obama administration's proposal, the
cost of future government rescues of large bank holding
companies and other complex financial firms would be paid by
their surviving rivals.